Tag Archive for 'social-media'

The Types of Facebook Fans

08
Apr
10

I’m not going to mention just how big Facebook is nowadays…not gonna even go there! It’s no wonder, given this social network’s pull, that most brands are moving towards it at the speed of light. Many are moving so fast, in fact, they’re not even sure where they’re headed. The first thing they think about is…how do I get a lot of FANS?

Well, the first thing they should think about is how does one become a fan. Explaining this to a brand might be difficult, as most marketers will say “because they love us.” Well, brand love just ain’t what it used to be. Users will not gather around a brand just because it is there – well, some will and some brands do have that effect. But let’s look at a more strategic optic – what sort of fans are out there and what mechanics work best to attract them?

In a broad sense, there are four types of fans – the unconscious, the grabber, the seeker and the lover. Each of them has a different motivation and requires a different approach. Let’s look at each of them:

The unconscious – These users see a friend who has become a fan of a page and just click on it. Most of the time they become a fan simply because their friend did. Other times they’ll become fans because the page name looked fun/odd/curious. Regardless, they become fans. But the odds are, you won’t get a peep out of these users – and they won’t come back to the page that often. Getting these users demands two efforts – spreading your page to a database of dense users with many contacts (who are a reference) and/or, sometimes, simply coming up with a fun/odd/curious name for the page itself.

The grabber – The prize winners. They will go for every freebie/campaign you create. They join because they’ve either become aware that the page had a campaign offering something to the fan base or saw on a friend’s wall a reference to that campaign. Anyway, they join in an effort to win a prize. The good thing about these users are that they will follow the page – as long as it keeps on pumping out the freebies/promotions/etc. Getting this user is easy – just create a campaign based on Facebook’s mechanics.

The seeker – These users actively seek pages pertaining to specific interests. Although very subjective, these users can be categorized into a group as not all users ‘actively seek’ pages in Facebook. Seekers look for interesting content because they become active followers, commenting and participating in the discussion. They’re the best type of fan you can get. To gather users such as these, the page has to be very content focused and have a strong update scheme that keeps users coming back for more, which means no dead moments with just weekly updates. Another strategy is cross posting – finding related pages where you can post content from your page to generate curiosity.

The lover – Quite simply the user who goes to a page simply because they love the brand. Not much a page can do to get them – simply having users join so the page shows up on the wall feed – or better, doing a campaign using Facebook ads and taking advantage of segmented user data.

Most users don’t fall into one of these categories specifically – most of us identify with each of these segments at one time or another. To effectively get a user to join a brand page we should devise a strategy that plays on all these levels. But one thing’s for sure – it’s not the number of fans you get that matter, but what you do with them and how they react to your stimulus.

Social Network Evolution – Twitter Lists

03
Nov
09

evolution_of_man

In previous articles we studied the evolution of the Internet Society.  Our theory is that an internet tool, when it first appears, is like the cast of a TV show; its personality isn’t very well defined at first.  But as time goes by and viewers start watching the show, the characters’ personalities take on new proportions (have you ever compared the first episodes of Friends to the final ones? Joey undergoes a constant ‘dumbing down’ process as the series progresses.)

As more users watch what’s happening on Twitter, it’s character is taking on new proportions.  For example, Twitter has recently released a feature in which you can follow lists. Sure, this is something avid users have been wanting for a while and is indeed a valuable add-on, but what’s most revealing is how this small functionality basically defines a little better what Twitter is exactly for – Twitter as an aggregator of links related to common interests for a user (a.k.a. the Internet Yellow Pages).

Lists basically allow a user to gather their followed users into, well lists. These lists can be followed individually or you can add all the users to the regular timeline as you always had on Twitter. But the most interesting thing is that you can share your lists and a user can choose to follow the exact same list. It means you are no longer following a person – you are following a theme or a topic. Which leads us to the point – what if users stop following other users because they have relevant content and start following a list where what matters is what the list as a whole broadcasts and not the individual valor of the broadcaster himself? Twitter becoming less a “What are you doing?” and more a “What is your group doing?”. You can probably still measure the interest rating of a user by his following/followers ratio, but now you have a new metric – how many list are you part of? What are those lists about? Why are you part of the list? And are you an active member of the list or are you there for aggregation purposes?

Sure, Twitter lists are useful. But what strikes us as an interesting study is the shift from the human islands of Twitterland to Content Continents built by the content the users generate. After all, we live in a Content Society.  And in this realm, Twitter just took one more step from plain generalist micro-blogging into a fully defined Social Network that can be set completely apart from all the others by focusing not on apps, photos or moods, but by content sharing in its purest form.

The SSS Rule For Social Networks

25
Sep
09

Everybody is (or should be) familiar with the KISS principle (keep it short and simple). It is widely applied throughout communications, marketing being no exception. It basically points out that things should be kept to a simple level as complexity only adds an unnecessary experience layer to the scene. This is also true for Online Marketing – the more complex the experience is, the more prone are you to losing your visitors. This applies to banners, sites and even social network interactions.

If you work in the online arena, then a lot of your clients have already come up to you and said, “Well, let’s go into [insert Social Network here]” – most likely Facebook now – and has tasked you and your team to strategize what the brand should do on Facebook. If you are going into a a group logic or just a fan page with some static information, then you should probably think about doing something more. However, if you are creating a more complex interaction, like a browser game or a new tool that you hope will be really interesting for the users, then you’ve got a lot of work ahead. The KISS principle will be your friend when figuring out what you should do, but I’ve got a new rule – the SSS Rule.

The SSS Rule simply stands for “Simple”, “Sharable”, “Scorable”. And it will help you evaluate your ideas before you take them to the client and even support them when you do your presentation. Let’s look into each of these:

Simple – No news here. KISS said to keep it simple. I’m telling you to keep it SIMPLE. The time people spend in Social Networks, although growing, is unbelievably fragmented. From tool to tool, game to game, post to post, users are prone to lose their attention in a very short time span. It’s a stresstetainment consequence. So if you want your tool to survive it has to be really time efficient – only requiring a little while to understand and about 1-5 minutes of the users time maximum. Beyond efficiency, keep in mind it also has to make them come back for more. One such example is Mafia Wars. With more users growing every day, Mafia Wars takes up to a few minutes each time you go in. But it always makes you come back in a few hours to carry on your game.

Sharable – Social Networks are all about sharing – and they make it easy to do it too! All you have to consider is that the tool has to have sharing potential – be it because it’s a natural mechanism such as the ingredient exchange in Restaurant City or because sharing it broadens the experience like adding more neighbors in Farmville.

Scorable – This is probably the hardest to explain. To keep users coming back for more, Social Network tools should create competition in an indirect way (e.g. a score or level that challenges users to develop new skills and ‘up their game’). Not only does competition open up more functionality in the application, it also becomes a status of its own. Consider the quiz craze on Facebook. What makes users crazy about quizzes like the Flixter Movie Quizzes is the fact that they see the results of their friends. This is what I mean as Scorable – it give a score or it contains an evaluation or evolution metric inside the application.

There you have it. The SSS rule will help you conceptualize and evaluate any application you create for a Social Network. Keep in mind, some applications might only fulfill two of the criteria such as Sharable + Simple; as one of the S’s might be more important to your target than another. Ultimately it’s up to you though, where you want to position the brand in the SSS matrix. In any case, using the SSS Rule will help you evaluate where your social application stands and what should you improve or not.

Developing Your Social Media Strategy #1: The Basics

07
Apr
09

Creating “buzz” around your product, business or event is the demand from clients to all social media marketing strategists. The common question is, can you take or produce a piece of content and make it go viral?” Can you wave your social media marketing wand and make everyone want to read it? Can you also use the same trickery and create traffic for our website?

For many, these practices are this magical event that must be forced upon the viewer or reader so that everyone will talk about “their thing.” However, buzz isn’t an event, but a reaction to a process. That process doesn’t start with a video on YouTube, but with a marketing strategy that encompasses social media and word-of-mouth marketing both online and offline.

Social Media Explorer highlights a few tactics to get you started when you begin to consider developing your social media strategy:

  • Monitor What’s Being Said
  • Create Content That You’ll Give Away
  • Fish Where The Fish Are At
  • Engage in Conversation
  • Track and Analyze the Results
  • Read full post at Social Media Explorer

    Twitter – Threat or Opportunity?

    01
    Apr
    09

    Twitter

    I know. You must be thinking “OMG, another Twitter post…”. Yes, Twitter has been on the spotlight for some time now and everybody seems to be using it. But what this post is actually about the uses of Twitter.
    If you consider the basic use of Twitter, it is far simpler than a Social Network. That’s because you cannot consider Twitter a social network per se, although it contains a strong networking (essential actually!) and it is based on exchanging information amongst peers. Nor can you consider it a Social Bookmarking tool, although the use it has been having from most users is to share links to interesting stuff they come across the web. It’s not a messaging system either as it goes beyond it. So what exactly is it? It really doesn’t matter what it is – it’s a lot more interesting to check what it can do.
    Twitter has something that is completely different from any other service of the same genre – it can work as an add-on to other tools online. That’s right – we can consider Twitter as an upgrade to the user’s needs and purposes online. Better yet, Twitter can work towards a company’s objectives and even a fellow website purposes. Consider the following examples:

    - Digg – Digg is a Social Bookmarking website. What Twitter does is, instead of having all sorts of digital scrap on the top popularity links due to having the same “credible” individuals posting and using convenient titles such as “TOP 10 MICROSOFT vs. APPLE and IPHONE PICTURES” (all the basic keywords to attain first place on Digg’s homepage), Twitter allows the users to select the people most in tune with their preferences and just check the postings and links placed by them. Yes, I said it’s not a Social Bookmarking service, but the fact is that more users are using Twitter to share their common interests and “work” related information. Which leads me to my next point;

    - Linked In – A professional social network, Linked In is probably one of the best sources of information for head hunters to find their targets. It’s like an online résumé. But what Linked In lacks (or simply users don’t use it to that purpose) is information regarding the involvement of the target with the type of job he has. Is he a simple Joe who just does his 8 hours of work and doesn’t do much more or is he this information powerhouse that would be valuable for the company? Simple – if this person has a Twitter account, you can check just the type of information he shares and is interested in simply by following him and checking who he is following. Sure, you can always say that the Linked In target is not exactly Twitter’s target, but consider that most Twitter users are professional above 35 years-old.

    - MySpace and Facebook – Here’s the bigger issue. How to mashup Twitter and these two while the first two have a service that sort of works the same way Twitter does. Well, consider this – how much stuff do you have on your wall to check? With Twitter, you can focus the attention towards where on the Profile you want people to look at without all the crowded information about the Quizzes you did.

    - Youtube – Having recently added a Twitter sharing button, Youtube has definitely discovered the potential in Twitter for it’s business. Twitter users are used to follow up links and, like I mentioned before, are more prone to go to a link to Youtube placed by a trusted followed source that on any other place.

    I could go on but I believe you got the big picture. The truth about Twitter is that it isn’t a threat to other Social Media websites – it can actually work towards a common goal. It all comes down to how the relationship between the companies influences the integration of their tools and, of course, on the user’s interest.
    Twitter is growing so we are sure to see more users joining Twitter. So, instead of fighting it, why not just ride the waves like Youtube did and find out how we can use it to the consumers advantage. Companies have already started scrapping Twitter and finding the first uses from this tool:

    - Extending the reach for those individuals or companies that already have a blogging strategy in place, and want to deepen or further ties. Good examples: Carnival Cruise Lines. The ScienceNewsBlog’s weather tracking updates. Andy Carvin’s PBS blog on education and technology.
    - Retailers announcing sales and deals. Good example: Deals on Dells. Blue-light specials at Amazon.
    - Increasing the ability for frequent updates to blogs or web sites or news. Examples: The NY Times, CNN, BBC, Adrants, and those of us here at MarketingProfs.
    - Building consensus or a community of supporters. Good examples: Presidential candidates John Edwards or Barack Obama.
    - Building buzz. Example: Scott Monty and CC Chapman introduce a new blog.
    - Updating breaking news at conferences or events. Example: Jeremiah at the Web 2.0 Expo. Forrester seems poised to use it to update happenings at its upcoming Consumer Forum.
    - Updating your network to shape your own personal branding: Example: Oh boy… there are zillions. Pick a face on Twitter. You’ll see what I mean.

    Get more information on how the Twitter community works and thinks for your marketing efforts. As I’ve repeat several times before respect your audience – don’t jump in and apply pure hard-selling tactics because that’s not what consumers what. It’s not enough to repeat that again.

    P&G Gives Its Marketers a Crash Course in Social Media

    12
    Mar
    09

    Procter & Gamble Co. paired 40 digital media and agency executives with 100 of its North American marketing directors in a contest to sell Tide T-shirts for charity last night as its much-awaited “Digital Hack Night” became a four-hour reality show aired largely in social media.

    Among the lessons learned: Fewer than 150 media and marketing people leaning heavily on their social-media friends and followers, resorting to big-name incentives and spending a total of about $4,000 on digital media can sell more than 2,000 T-shirts at $20 a pop for charity and hit the top 10 trending topics on Twitter in the process.

    Read the article on AdAge ›

    We’re working on organizing workshops to sensibilize our clients and prospects to the benefits and trends in social media. Drop us a line if you would want to tell you more about it!

    Brands and Social Media: Why they suck at it so far and why they need to improve

    10
    Mar
    09

    Part 1 › The Struggle
    Part 2 › The Benefits




    The TrendWatch:


    The TrendWatch is the collective postings of some of the FullSIX Group’s designers, strategists, and consultants on new media and marketing trends. It is meant to be an impromptu think-tank, and is a way for us to share theories and beliefs about how we think communication and connectivity is evolving.

    We work for The FullSIX Group; a leading full service marketing agency with digital DNA. From our 15 international offices with over 600 employees, we constantly embrace and encourage innovation to make integrated marketing and communication campaigns that are more accountable and efficient for our clients.