Tag Archive for 'elections'

Screenshot: Facebook wants you to be a good voting citizen too

04
Nov
08

Few neat examples spotted today on the President of Social Networks:

1/ Donate your status to one of the candidates with the Causes application:
lucas.gif

2/ Find on a map where your polling place is from the Facebook Election Page (no red pin for me, just a Ben & Jerry’s promo cone though):
find.jpg

3/ Tell your friends you’ve voted from Facebook’s homepage:
voted.gif

4/ And check how many Facebookers declared their vote at the top of your NewsFeed:
numbers.gif

Pretty cool. I wonder if other countries will be as active and engaged when it comes to major national elections.

Screenshot: CNN-Facebook Forum for US Elections

03
Nov
08

cnn.jpg

After their partnership with YouTube last year for the Primaries, CNN gets the Facebook treatment

Screenshot: Behind the Candidates

30
Oct
08

linds.gif

Impressive work of research for this site that compares, in a simple and über-effective interface, the Top Advisors on foreign policy, national security, energy, health, and economics—as well as the campaign advisors for both Obama and McCain. Definitely a handy resource for those who still haven’t picked a side (how is that even possible, I don’t know…).

Congrats to my friend Lindsay Ballant and her partner on this project, Ian Boyle, for putting this together.

Obama will nominate his VP by mobile phone: real-politic or political marketing genius?

22
Aug
08

oba.jpg

(A post by blog-guest, Kevin VILLERT)

Last evening i was watching CNN for my daily fix of news in the world. But today is a special day, it was all about Obama’s nomination of his VP. Every five seconds at the bottom of my TV you could read: “Obama: I’ve decided on my running mate” and also something like “McCain cuts into Obama’s lead”. Yes, McCain is ahead in the polls, but the news focus on Obama. Why?

Because he won’t tell us who he chose.

Like a Hitchcock “chef d’oeuvre”, Obama maintains the suspense. And then! I discovered that the presidential candidate will announce his VP on his website! Good good! I’m so excited! I go online, enter HIS website and land to this page.

What i find out is that Obama will personally send you a text message and an email to inform you personally the nomination. And before the journalists (even more exciting)!

Real-politic or political marketing genius?

I vote #2. Why?

Pros:
* three words: “engagement, engagement, engagement”
* it’s personalized: I’m already peeing in my pant to the idea i’ll receive a SMS from Obama! I have never been a fan, but i just ordered his t-shirt on his website. That I will wear all nights until his election.
* it differentiates Obama: “Oh! McCain is such an old man, he does not know what is a text message!”
* it attracts the attentions: the buzz is everywhere now.
* he recruits prospect supporters: now you will be spammed daily by Obama. Here i imagine a subject line: “Give $10 donation and receive a free Obama Bobble-head”
* and activates his supporters: “You know O. anytime you have the blues you can call me for some good advices.”

Cons:
(send me your list)

Stay tuned.

If it’s important, it will find me

28
Mar
08

rabbit.jpg

That’s, in essence, how the “social media generation” deals with with political news and news in a broader sense. For the first time, social networks and blogs are playing a major role in a presidential campaign in the USA. Facebook, myspace, most of the web 2.0 sites that we use today didn’t exist 4 years ago, during the precedent elections, or with a limited audience.

But as of February 2008, they respectively have 8.6, 17.7 millions average daily visitors.

According to interviews and recent surveys, younger voters tend to be not just consumers of news and current events but conduits as well — sending out e-mailed links and videos to friends and their social networks. And in turn, they rely on friends and online connections for news to come to them. In essence, they are replacing the professional filter — reading The Washington Post, clicking on CNN.com — with a social one.

“There are lots of times where I’ll read an interesting story online and send the U.R.L. to 10 friends,” said Lauren Wolfe, 25, the president of College Democrats of America. “I’d rather read an e-mail from a friend with an attached story than search through a newspaper to find the story.”

Go check out the New York Times article for more details.

Sorry for the almost unrelated Easter photo.

DIY: Polls for Presidential Elections ‘08

06
Feb
08

Google trends
While Olivier was writing his post yesterday, I was also thinking about the Elections, polls and whether the Internet could provide hints on the candidates results, through its different channels.

I’ve always defended the idea that the web speaks the truth, thanks to the information boost of the participatory web (web 2.0). It is a living, constantly mutating common intelligence, it is the brain of the connected humanity and, for better and for worst, the weighted sum of our individual conscience, desires, fears, ambitions and beliefs.

So, if we have all this trustworthy information at our reach, than we are all able to analyze it and take our own conclusions. We can actually make our own polls by measuring our representative sources.

Google Trends (see the picture above), tells us that Barack Obama is the candidate with most search volume registered on Google, among U.S. users. The same analysis on Republican candidates shows us that Ron Paul is, by far, the Republican candidate that is on the Top-of-Mind of U.S. users. Strange, hum? This comes as a surprise for me as for you, because I expected McCain to lead this indicator. So, Barack Obama wins on Google Trends.

I analysed Democratic Candidates (Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Mike Gravel) and Republican Candidates (John McCain, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, Ron Paul, Alan Keyes).

I tried to discover which candidates’ names where mentioned more often in web pages indexed in Google. That is to say, what was the share-of-exposure of each candidate. Here, Hillary Clinton is the winner, with 11.600.000 pages, followed by John McCain (7,580,000) and Ron Paul (4,780,000).

I also considered rerunning this analysis in Yahoo!, since Google normally indexes fewer pages than Yahoo! Here, share-of-exposure has a different winner: Barack Obama (158,000,000 pages), followed by Hillary Clinton (150,000,000) and John McCain (103,000,000).

YouTube gives us an idea of the share of audiovisual material each candidate has out there. The big winner here is Republican candidate Ron Paul (105.000 videos), followed by Democrats Hillary Clinton (33.200) and Barack Obama (32.500).

Facebook tells us how many friends/supporters each candidate has on this platform. Obama crushes the competition with a total of 374.650 friends, followed by Hillary Clinton (90.912) and Ron Paul (82.353).

On MySpace, Hillary Clinton is the winner with 41.123 friends, followed by Mitt Romney (37.077) and Mike Huckabee (34.717). John McCain, in my opinion made a big mistake in this platform. When you visit his page, you have a resume of this candidate and a link to become his friend. Only after he approves your friend request, you are able to see the regular MySpace sections… so I never got the chance to find out how many friends he has! Seems to me that Democrats understand the Internet and social networks better than Republicans.

Through Google BlogSearch, I found out that the Blogosphere produces much more content on Barack Obama than anyone else (3,211,145 posts), followed by Hillary Clinton (1,166,239) and John McCain (1,117,461). Unfortunately I didn’t have the time to make a qualitative analysis, so I don’t know if this is positive Buzz or negative Buzz…

Then I measured each of the candidates official websites’ Link Popularity, and I discovered that Ron Paul has the most websites linking to his (2,948,938 back-links), followed by Barack Obama (1,206,735) and Mike Huckabee (721,072).

Last but not least, I compared the estimated traffic of the candidates’ official websites through Alexa: Obama has the most traffic by far, followed by Hillary Clinton and John McCain.

So, I gathered all the data and here are the final results of my DIY polls for the future president of the USA:

  • #1 – Hillary Clinton (1st in MySpace and Google, 2nd in Facebook, YouTube, Yahoo! and Blogosphere).
  • #2 – Barack Obama (1st in Facebook, Yahoo! and the Blogosphere, 2nd in Link Popularity, 3rd in YouTube).
  • #3 – John McCain (2nd in Google, 3rd in the Blogosphere and Yahoo!).

Ron Paul really intrigued me… I’d say he had better chances than McCain, since he was 1st on Link Popularity and YouTube, 3rd on Google and Facebook. Well, but Super Tuesday already proved me wrong, McCain’s the man for the Republicans.

Now I only have to wait a couple of months to see if my theory is right and if we all can start making our own polls based on my interpretation on the spirit of web 2.0: user participation leads to the strengthening and accuracy of collective consciousness.

Super Duper Tuesday on the Internets

05
Feb
08

twit.jpg

Today is Super Duper Tuesday in twenty-four states here in the US. Voters have to choose their candidate for Democratic and Republican parties. If your sources to follow the elections are more YouTube, design blogs and poster-generating sites than the New York Times, you’ll probably drool over the mashup developed by the Google, Twitter and Twittervision teams.

Throughout what could have been a regular Pancake Day, follow the election-related twits on a map across the country. Followed by, at around 8PM EST, live election results of all the Super Tuesday states.

More “Super Tuesday on the Internets” Great Stuff: AXE

axe.jpg
The (genuine?) new print ad from AXE that will premiere tomorrow in newspapers in Chicago and New York City, as found on PokeNY’s blog.

Ch, Ch, Ch, Ch, Chaan-aange


A montage of all the candidates singing the same Bowie’s song. Seriously hilarious, especially starting around 0:45




The TrendWatch:


The TrendWatch is the collective postings of some of the FullSIX Group’s designers, strategists, and consultants on new media and marketing trends. It is meant to be an impromptu think-tank, and is a way for us to share theories and beliefs about how we think communication and connectivity is evolving.

We work for The FullSIX Group; a leading full service marketing agency with digital DNA. From our 15 international offices with over 600 employees, we constantly embrace and encourage innovation to make integrated marketing and communication campaigns that are more accountable and efficient for our clients.