<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is YouTube doomed? Would you be willing to pay a monthly fee for a better product?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetrendwatch.com/2009/04/09/is-youtube-doomed-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-a-monthly-fee-for-a-better-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetrendwatch.com/2009/04/09/is-youtube-doomed-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-a-monthly-fee-for-a-better-product/</link>
	<description>A daily serving of new media strategies, marketing concepts and designs that caught our attention.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:57:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gurney @ MP3 Itunes Downloads Store</title>
		<link>http://www.thetrendwatch.com/2009/04/09/is-youtube-doomed-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-a-monthly-fee-for-a-better-product/comment-page-1/#comment-6139</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gurney @ MP3 Itunes Downloads Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetrendwatch.com/?p=2835#comment-6139</guid>
		<description>People who use the internet regularly enjoy its flexibility and freedom.
We have become use to free services on the most popular websites. It is very dangerous to start charging people for something they have been getting for free. User generated content is also key to Youtube, and if they lose users, they will lose new content too.
Flickr is fundamentally still free but brings in money through additional options, perhaps Youtube could do this.
Many now even get free MP3s and DVDs (illegally) so wouldn&#039;t be interested in a Youtube subscription service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who use the internet regularly enjoy its flexibility and freedom.<br />
We have become use to free services on the most popular websites. It is very dangerous to start charging people for something they have been getting for free. User generated content is also key to Youtube, and if they lose users, they will lose new content too.<br />
Flickr is fundamentally still free but brings in money through additional options, perhaps Youtube could do this.<br />
Many now even get free MP3s and DVDs (illegally) so wouldn&#8217;t be interested in a Youtube subscription service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray</title>
		<link>http://www.thetrendwatch.com/2009/04/09/is-youtube-doomed-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-a-monthly-fee-for-a-better-product/comment-page-1/#comment-5535</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetrendwatch.com/?p=2835#comment-5535</guid>
		<description>no it wont. youtube has been the favorite sites of billions since 2005. now one the biggest websites in the world is going to fail. but i didn&#039;t know about a monthly fee(thats wierd)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no it wont. youtube has been the favorite sites of billions since 2005. now one the biggest websites in the world is going to fail. but i didn&#8217;t know about a monthly fee(thats wierd)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel</title>
		<link>http://www.thetrendwatch.com/2009/04/09/is-youtube-doomed-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-a-monthly-fee-for-a-better-product/comment-page-1/#comment-5455</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetrendwatch.com/?p=2835#comment-5455</guid>
		<description>Better ... better ... what will be a better YouTube ? : better quality? Interesting content ? Interests-oriented HP ? better UX ?
I will not pay for smthing I can already find in Vimeo or Dailymotion.... YouTube&#039;s big advantage : nice search   few copyright efforts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better &#8230; better &#8230; what will be a better YouTube ? : better quality? Interesting content ? Interests-oriented HP ? better UX ?<br />
I will not pay for smthing I can already find in Vimeo or Dailymotion&#8230;. YouTube&#8217;s big advantage : nice search   few copyright efforts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
